Last updated on November 1, 2025
No. Broadcasting live from inside a UK courthouse without permission is prohibited under section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and section 9 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. Only authorized media may film or broadcast under strict judicial approval.
Why This Rule Exists
The principle of open justice is a cornerstone of the UK legal system. Courts are open to the public, and journalists can report proceedings, but broadcasting live from inside a courtroom is another matter entirely. This restriction isn’t about secrecy—it’s about safeguarding the fairness of trials and protecting participants from undue influence or exposure.
Historically, the ban dates back to the early 20th century when sensational photography disrupted trials. The Criminal Justice Act 1925 outlawed photography in courts, and later, the Contempt of Court Act 1981 extended restrictions to sound recordings. These measures aim to prevent distractions, maintain decorum, and ensure justice is administered without external pressure.
The Legal Framework
Two key statutes govern this area. Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 makes it an offence to take photographs or film inside courts. Section 9 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 prohibits sound recording and broadcasting without leave of the court. Violating these provisions can result in contempt proceedings, fines, or imprisonment.
Recent reforms introduced limited exceptions. The Crown Court (Recording and Broadcasting) Order 2020 allows authorized media—such as BBC, ITN, Sky News, and PA Media—to film judges’ sentencing remarks in certain cases. Even then, filming requires judicial approval, and strict conditions apply: only the judge is filmed, victims and witnesses are excluded, and reporting restrictions remain in force.
Why Permission Matters
Live broadcasting poses risks beyond distraction. It can influence public opinion, intimidate witnesses, and compromise jury impartiality. Courts balance transparency with fairness, and permission ensures that broadcasts do not interfere with justice. Judges consider applications carefully, weighing public interest against potential harm.
How It Works Today
Authorized media must apply at least five working days before the hearing. The judge decides whether to allow filming and whether it can be broadcast live. Even approved broadcasts include a short delay to comply with reporting restrictions. Unauthorized filming or streaming remains strictly forbidden.
The Supreme Court and Court of Appeal operate under different rules, permitting filming of judgments and legal arguments. These exceptions reflect efforts to modernize justice while preserving its integrity.
Consequences of Breaking the Rule
Ignoring these restrictions is not a minor infraction—it’s contempt of court. Penalties include fines and up to two years in prison. Equipment used for unlawful recording can be confiscated. The law applies to everyone, from journalists to members of the public, regardless of intent.
A Tradition of Open Justice
The UK’s approach seeks balance: courts remain open, proceedings are reported, and selected broadcasts enhance transparency. But the sanctity of the courtroom demands control. Permission isn’t a formality—it’s a safeguard for justice.
See more on UNITED KINGDOM
Sources
The Crown Court (Recording and Broadcasting) Order 2020 – Legislation.gov.uk
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/637/contents
Publication date: ongoing
Contempt of Court Act 1981 – Legislation.gov.uk
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/49/section/9?view=plain
Publication date: ongoing